ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - A senior official from the Kurdish administration in northeast Syria's (Rojava) ruling body and the spokesperson for the main opposition group on Saturday rejected US Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack’s assertion that decentralization has never worked in the Middle East. Their pushback comes as minority communities across Syria increasingly call for some form of decentralized governance in the aftermath of Bashar al-Assad’s collapse.
"Decentralization has never really worked anywhere in this region," Tom Barrack told reporters on the sidelines of the Doha Forum on Saturday when asked if decentralization is possible in new Syria. He cited the Balkans, Lebanon, Iraq, and Libya as examples where he claimed decentralization has failed.
"When it is said that decentralization has not succeeded in the Middle East, we are facing a hasty conclusion that ignores the roots of the political crisis in the region. What has failed in the region is not decentralization, but on the contrary, it is the strict centralist model that has monopolized the state, marginalized society, and created the weakness we see today," Hassan Mohammed Ali, co-chair of Public Relations Office for Rojava's ruling Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), told Rudaw.
The SDC is the civilian body of the Syrian Democratic Forces, which acts as the de facto military force in Rojava.
"It is important to note that those 'decentralization experiences' that existed in the Middle East were never decentralization in the institutional sense that is known," he added. "A model of governance cannot be judged because it was not implemented, nor can an idea be described as failed before being given a real opportunity for implementation."
The interim government in Syria, led by former jihadist leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, came to power with a pledge of inclusivity but has come under fire from Kurds, Christians, Druze and Alawites who say they have been sidelined. Minority communities have criticized the transitional constitution that centers on Islamic jurisprudence and the centralization of power in Damascus.
